Friday, July 18, 2008

Yankee's (Finally) Coming Home.

Mexican archaeologists have determined that four skeletons unearthed at the site of the Battle of Monterrey, which was a major battle in the Mexican-American War, are those of American, and are not Mexican, as they had originally figured.

Their conclusion came after discovering American coins near the skeletons. Prior to this, consensus was that the graves in which the corpses were buried held Mexican casualties.

Now there are plans to carry out DNA testing on the skeletons, and contact nearest of kin--and repatriate the bones to the United States.

An interesting point is that part of the determination that the skeletons were of Americans is that measurements of the corpses' bones and skulls played a part in the concluding that they belonged to Americans.

Why is this? If they tested the bones for chemicals linking the skeletons to parts of the United States (chemicals from the water they drank as a child, for instance), then the measurements would make sense. Otherwise, there were Mexicans who were primarily of European descent, and not all Americans are of European descent. Measuring the lengths and dimensions of bones and skulls should not be all that strong a determinant of whether or not a skeleton is American or Mexican.

Another thing to consider is that during the war, a lot of Irish Roman Catholics emigrated from the United States to fight alongside the Mexicans, their fellow Roman Catholics, against the Americans--who were primarily Protestant. Since the archaeologists originally believed that only Mexicans were buried at the site, could these skeletons belong to Irish Americans who fought on the side of Mexico? That would reconcile the measurements and the traditional history.

The Mexicans lost the war, and the Americans won. Mexico ceded roughly half of its territory to the United States, including the key state of California. Mexico has been clearly subordinate to its northern neighbor since. Although there is still some animosity over the Mexican-American War (or rather the war's outcome), most people on both side of the border accept what happened and that the ceded territory belongs to the United States. And today, Mexico and the United States (and Canada) are close allies and part of NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Area.

Tag this post with:
Delicious Logo Delicious Digg Logo Digg Technorati Logo Technorati reddit Logo reddit Facebook Logo Facebook Stumble Upon Toolbar StumbleUpon Furl Logo Furl Digg Logo blinklist

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Africa.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:
The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries + Biologeel.

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Kudos Brazil for Taking a Stand Against Abortion.

Kudos to Brazil for rejecting a proposed law which would have granted a supposed 'right' to an abortion. The world's largest majority Roman Catholic country still considers abortions to be illegal except in the cases of rape and when the mother's life is in danger. That is far more than the world's largest majority Protestant (and general Christian) country--the United States--has done.

It is astounding at how many countries where the majority of inhabitants, occasionally the overwhelming majority of inhabitants, profess to be Christians, have legalized the termination of a human's life because that life would have been a hindrance (or so they believe). The people have been fooled in many cases into accepting abortion as a 'woman's right to choose' by way of loaded phrases such as the preceding along with little ditties. For instance, using 'embryo' or 'fetus' instead of 'unborn child' so as to make the child seem less human and therefore cause less of a furor among people who might become angry at the wanton murder of babies. 'Embryo' and 'fetus' are completely accurate terms, but the fact is, if you let an embryo and especially a fetus develop, the result is usually what would be incontrovertibly a human being. Even the phrase 'terminate a pregnancy,' probably the most violent of the commonly used terms is not balanced, and definitely not critical of abortions. Notice that the pregnancy, the process, is terminated; there is no mention of the unborn child being killed. Even the most baseline term, 'abortion' is loaded, portraying the ending of a life as little more than the cancellation of a process.

Furthermore, many in those countries who support abortion are fond of depicting the issue as being equal with homosexual marriage as an enemy of the 'religious right.' In elections, they argue that populists stir up these ignorant rednecks to divert their attention from the 'real issues' such as the economy or foreign affairs. For people supposedly open to other views, they are particularly dense. Abortion and homosexual marriage are not equal, although they are both bad--from a Christian perspective. An analogy would be a serial murderer and an abuser of prescription drugs. Currently, society frowns on both those types, but definitely considers the former far more loathsome than the latter.

Christians consider a single zygote (when a human life is a single cell) to be completely human, and the willful termination of that life by abortion to be a murder. In the cases of miscarriage, that would be the death of a child, not just some thing that failed to mature into a human. If you believed that millions of people have been murdered--and are being murdered each year, wouldn't that take priority over economic or foreign affairs issues? It would be akin to declaring a Holocaust, a genocide, happening right in front of the world, a side topic. For Christians, the murder of millions of the most innocent humans out there per annum has to trump practically any other issue, which is why for many Christians, they will not vote for a pro-abortion politician, even if they agree with him on lesser issues. The opposite for a pro-life candidate who would get their support, even if he happened to be less competent in other areas.

So shame on those in the developed, Western, 'Christian' world who have approved of a genocide which goes on today. And kudos to those in the developing, Western, 'Christian' world who have stood up for a human's right to life, which far supersedes any human creature's 'right to choose.' Bravo Brazil.

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Africa.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.

Or:
The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries.

Tag this post with:
Delicious Logo Delicious Digg Logo Digg Technorati Logo Technorati reddit Logo reddit Facebook Logo Facebook Stumble Upon Toolbar StumbleUpon Furl Logo Furl Digg Logo blinklist

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Africa.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:
The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries + Biologeel.